I think it looks great.

But in the future you may want to upgrade the graphics card so you can play games on max settings (I think you'll be able to play current games at mid-high settings).

Do you plan on over clocking?

Get a ATI HD4830 or 4850 at least if you're looking at future games.

Looks fine except I would reccomend a better grpahics card. Also, is this the one your buying?

Ooh, I thought this was a custom build. Mea culpa. Anyway, as I said, Looks fine except you might want a better gfx card. If you just like the gameplay and don't mind running the games on low or med or whatever, then you should be fine.

EDIT: Monitor info? Size, LCD/CRT, resolution?

Looks fine, just if you're planning on doing gaming in the next few years, you'll want at least an ATI 4800 series card. I recommend the 4850.

This would be your best option for a 4850.

I thought xp could only recognize a max of 2 gigs of ram but correct me if i'm wrong.

Deneb is coming soon which means a lot faster processors. You might not be able to overclock the computer if its a pre-built. Also that video card would need to be replaced if your considering gaming.

XP can address up to 4GB memory--which typically ends up being 3-3.5GB RAM if you install 4GB total. What you're thinking of is that 32-bit programs are only able to use 2GB RAM on their own, even if you have 3+GB available. That's a limitation of 32-bit programs overall. If they want to use >2GB, they are required to use your local Page File, which is one reason that 32-bit versions of photo editing software are typically slow (on mid-range and high-end rigs) when editing very large images. It's not so much that you don't have processing power as a good portion of the information is locked on a (relatively) slow hard drive. It's also the same reason why a fast solid-state drive will make a good system run (much) faster on synthetics--the data that previously had to be cached to the Page File is available without the typical seek time--instead of 10ms, it can be 0.1ms. Not to mention that they are typically faster reading and writing than their disc-based ancestors.

I'd have advised an Intel processor, and an NVidia Graphics card, but if its prebuilt then thats okay.

Get a better graphics card in the future.

The 4850 is the better choice. The 4670 is like a 3870. For 40eur more, I'd say definitely HD4850. You'll get significantly better performance that way.

It actually looks great

Here's a good article that should help you make sense of graphics card specs. It's quite outdated so some of the information might not apply anymore but you will still be able to get the gist of it.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/graphi...ers-3,1297.html

HD4650 (RV730 Pro, 320sp) < HD4670 (RV730 XT, 320sp) < HD4830 (RV770 LE, 640sp) < HD4850 (RV770 Pro, 800sp) < HD4870 (RV770 XT, 800sp) < HD4850X2 (R700 Pro, 2x800sp) < HD4870X2 (R700 XT, 2x800sp)

**Do note that _sp is a measure of the enabled stream processors. In short (that is ordered by performance), the more, the better. Even though the HD4670 has just 320 stream processors enabled, it is going to be slower than a HD4830 by a good amount. The higher clocks only help when you compared the same core. They're different.

Basically, the HD4830 is a partially-disabled HD4850. Reading what you're saying literally, you're asking if the HD4830 is better then the HD4850? It's not in the least--the HD4850 is the better choice. Now if you mean if a HD4850 is worth 37Eur over the HD4670, I'd say yes, by a good amount.