Or you could do the right thing and report them as spam, and not post in them at all.
Falcon
Aug 21 2009, 12:40 PM
QUOTE (Gillis @ Aug 20 2009, 01:34 AM)
Why would we add a smiley that can only be used in a negative context?
Umm Gillis? - --- On the other hand, that's a facepalm smiley that could define a lot more than negativity.
Twist of Fate
Aug 21 2009, 12:51 PM
^ Those could be used in a joking sense, and are quite frequently, thank you very much.
Also, if Sal's ever did have a facepalm emoticon, it would have to be animated.
Topdog
Aug 21 2009, 12:54 PM
I never see why there's always a debate on this. Just take the smiley and add it onto the forums. It takes less than a minute for an administrator to do so, and it's clear that this smiley would be used. At least more times than is used.
^ I like the one that Taker has.
Goggie
Aug 21 2009, 01:06 PM
I like the smiley Taker chose, and since it could be used in a number of places I would support it being added.
Cheezit
Aug 21 2009, 02:17 PM
I like taker's emote. It could be used a lot and sometimes even in a joking manner. I support adding it.
Fruityfed
Aug 21 2009, 06:18 PM
facepalming has been whored to death and this smiley would be used by annoying kids who lol at failblog every day.
mad max
Aug 25 2009, 06:57 PM
support taker's facepalm hope this get's added
Sk8skull
Sep 26 2009, 07:34 PM
I like takers emote I support...its awesome
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.