QUOTE (Gangsta4Lyf @ Nov 8 2009, 01:21 PM)

QUOTE (Poetic Minds @ Nov 8 2009, 05:57 AM)

It'll be the same as all the other end of the world movies,
*open my popcorn* theres a leading white male character whos no doubt a scientist who knows all about it, people dont believe it or him and dismiss him as a piece of trash, the scenarios he predicted actually happen and people panic, *finished my popcorn* it is at this time the leading white male plays the hero role and one person believes him, they then go on a rescue mission to save the world *gets up out of seat to go get more popcorn* (while im getting popcorn lots of random destruction happens, etc etc, including at some point the statue of liberty getting torn to shreds as is a popular trend in most end of the world movies) *gets back from buying popcorn and sits down* leading white male character survives but a lot of innocent people die, after the final disaster and everytyhing is smashed to shizzle the movie is left with an inconclusive ending, the last scene shows the leading white male as one of the sole survivors at the tip of a flame scorched hill overlooking the destruction and devastation of the land he loved and once called home.
The End, another x-million dollars thrown down the drain.
epic.
but yeah, that is most likely what will happen
What's with repeating the fact that the main character is a white male over and over again? More men are white than anything else in the US, it's not like it makes the film racist or boring if the main character is white. Okay, if EVERYONE in the film was white, then that would be a problem. But the president is African-American, and from the sound of the review I read, he's a good leader, so it's obviously not being racist.
About the leader being male: It's like that in ALMOST EVERY MOVIE. Yes, I'm sure that annoys a lot of people. But that doesn't make
2012 something specifically to complain about.
Main character isn't a scientist, he's a divorced guy with his ex-wife and her new significant other.
It sounds like a bad movie with awesome special effects. But if the world is getting destroyed, I don't care about how implausibly the people survive. I care about the fact that the world IS getting destroyed, and that nobody is actually dying so I can enjoy watching the buildings fall to pieces.
Lighten up, everyone. There are good movies, and then there are movies where you get to watch awesome special effects. And then there are both, obviously. But one or the other should be good enough for an awful lot of us.