Jump to content
Sal's RuneScape Forum
  • entries
    402
  • comments
    1,077
  • views
    30,833

Banned For Speaking Their Mind, Please Stop.

Sign in to follow this  
Scary Food Item

46 views

Throughout Sal's history we have had a lot of good members banned. I agree with you being upset about these people being banned but some reactions bug me.

 

For about a week after a member gets banned, there are roughly 15,892 posts made about how awesome this member was and how "Unfair" his ban was. "OMG NUBY MODS U BANED HIM 4 SPEEKIN HIS MIND!!!" Will probably show up in 15,892 of these posts.

 

*Sigh*

 

This annoys me. It doesn't matter, they probably deserved it. There's a difference between being able to speak your mind and not having self control. I garuntee you these members lost control more than once, resulting in a ban. I'm not talking about anyone specific (Seriously, I'm not so please don't say I am) but I have seen many of these members who "Speak their mind" lose self control.

 

So please, get over it.

 

NOTE: I am posting this because of recent events but I'm not talking about a specific member.

Sign in to follow this  


17 Comments


Recommended Comments

It doesn't matter, they probably deserved it.
Maybe you could check out what they actually said and have your own opinion instead of assuming that the Sals staff always gets everything right.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Patou's official reasoning was that that specific blog entry crossed the line. I disagree completely. What's wrong with discussing it?We all know what you are talking about: Co-Z, Cactus, and DiZ.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Patou's official reasoning was that that specific blog entry crossed the line. I disagree completely. What's wrong with discussing it?We all know what you are talking about: Co-Z, Cactus, and DiZ.
I am posting this because of them getting banned. But I have seen this a lot before. I could name a member where this exact thing happeded but I won't because I know I'll get flamed.

Share this comment


Link to comment
You'd be scared of getting flamed why?
Because-I don't want this to turn this into a debate (Although that may already be happening)-I don't want to get flamed, that's it.
Co-Z was banned unfairly. :D We are allowed to discuss it.
-I don't care if you discuss it.-You can't say that until you see his warn log.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Like I said before, Patou's reason was for the blog entry crossing the line.
That was for one warn. Were the other 6 unfair too?

Share this comment


Link to comment

co-z "crossed the line" in the word of that patou. was quite possibly the stupidest ban i have ever seen in ANY forum :/BUT this is from what i heard his warn was from...his last blog entry. If it was something else besides that, then thats a different story. BUT if it is just from the blog entry...it completely unreasable.

Share this comment


Link to comment
co-z "crossed the line" in the word of that patou. was quite possibly the stupidest ban i have ever seen in ANY forum :D BUT this is from what i heard his warn was from...his last blog entry. If it was something else besides that, then thats a different story. BUT if it is just from the blog entry...it completely unreasable.
That's the thing. That was one warn. It may have been unfair but he had already earned 6 before that. He wasn't banned because of the blog entry, he was just warned for it, but because he had 6 before that, that warn got him banned.

Share this comment


Link to comment
BUT if it is just from the blog entry...it completely unreasable.
Thats the thing it was not just from that blog entry, it was a lot of little things that eventually got him this last warn.

Share this comment


Link to comment
BUT if it is just from the blog entry...it completely unreasable.
Thats the thing it was not just from that blog entry, it was a lot of little things that eventually got him this last warn.
Where in the rules does it say "little things agg up to warns"?

Share this comment


Link to comment
BUT if it is just from the blog entry...it completely unreasable.
Thats the thing it was not just from that blog entry, it was a lot of little things that eventually got him this last warn.
And as Adam? said, if these "little things" do exist, who notifies people the people commiting all these little things that they are about to be warned or banned due to them? Oh, and Scary Applesauce, you can't say it was a fair warn until you see the warn log too.

Share this comment


Link to comment
BUT if it is just from the blog entry...it completely unreasable.
Thats the thing it was not just from that blog entry, it was a lot of little things that eventually got him this last warn.
Where in the rules does it say "little things agg up to warns"?
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that he had 6 warns before that. Even if the 7th warn for the blog was unfair, who's to say the other 6 were unfair too?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Guest
This blog entry is now closed to further comments.
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines and Privacy Policy.