Jump to content
Sal's RuneScape Forum
  • entries
    314
  • comments
    1432
  • views
    8111

128bit Versus 64bit Encryption (wireless Stuff)


Naota

118 views

People don't know what kind of encryption to use when setting up their wireless network, so I'll simply put the pluses and minuses here, and you can choose for yourself.

 

64bit Encryption:

While it's known that senior hackers, and government hackers can get into a 64bit Encryption within 4-10 minutes, it's going to be faster against the 128bit. All the data has half as less protection on it, so it can access your computer faster. It's not secure compared to 128bit.

 

If you live in a large apartment complex, or around a lot of other people, chances are, one of them is a hacker and knows how to beat your simple 10-hex digit encryption. There is a whole website dedicated to teaching how to do so, link (You wish). They even provide script kiddie programs (script kiddie is a "hacker" who uses other programs that other people made, and claims that he made those programs).

 

The upside to this, is that most likely, people won't hack your wireless, or even attempt it. It's not a worth while thing. Plus it's a bit faster than 128 encryption

 

128bit Encryption:

128bit is a lot safer, as it requires more hex-characters to decode, and there are a lot less script-kiddie programs out for this. Although, the fact that it has a higher encryption, means it's going to take a couple more milliseconds for your computer to decode. This is recommended if you live in a large, high traffic area (New York apartment or something).

 

People who try to hack these, usually are script kiddies who don't know a thing about packet sniffing (the process of copying downloaded information, and decoding it). It's a heck load safer than 64bit, due to the fact that it requires almost three times the hex-characters to decode. 43AC8D4D2258D79BFB6BC32608 versus 5DK29CM65A.

 

The upside to this, is that it takes about ten times longer to hack than a 64 bit encryption, and is highly recommended for high traffic areas). The downside, is that it takes your computer some extra millisecond to process this.

 

Too long?

Didn't read it?

 

64bit is for rural areas

128bit is for cities.

 

Also, it seems google knows what I am looking for:

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/2171/61875792tp4.jpg

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

64 bit has 264 possible key combinations (18446744073709551616), 128 bit has 2128. Remember that 268, for example, is sixteen times as much as 264.Interesting read, Naota. :)If it would take ten minutes to decrypt a 64 bit key, that's 2^64/10 attempts per minute. Seeing that a 128 bit key has the equalevant of (264)2 possibilities, it would take 264 times as much tries to decode the key. That's 264*10 = 184467440737095516160 minutes.That's 184467440737095516160 / ( 60*24*365) = 350965450413043 years to decode the key.I think you're pretty safe with a 128 bit key. :)

Link to comment
That's 184467440737095516160 / ( 60*24*365) = 350965450413043 years to decode the key.I think you're pretty safe with a 128 bit key. :)
You haven't met the power of botnets have you?I have a friend who could decode 256bit encryptions in two hours.
Link to comment
That's 184467440737095516160 / ( 60*24*365) = 350965450413043 years to decode the key.I think you're pretty safe with a 128 bit key. :)
You haven't met the power of botnets have you?I have a friend who could decode 256bit encryptions in two hours.
That's either a very effecient bruteforcer, or a badly performed simulation.Processors can reach 40 gigaflops, that's about 12 billion tries per second. But if you hack a wireless network, you're bound to the low data speeds, plus the speed of the router. There's no way that you can try 2^256 keys in two hours.
Link to comment
That's 184467440737095516160 / ( 60*24*365) = 350965450413043 years to decode the key.I think you're pretty safe with a 128 bit key. :glasses:
You haven't met the power of botnets have you?I have a friend who could decode 256bit encryptions in two hours.
That's either a very effecient bruteforcer, or a badly performed simulation.Processors can reach 40 gigaflops, that's about 12 billion tries per second. But if you hack a wireless network, you're bound to the low data speeds, plus the speed of the router. There's no way that you can try 2^256 keys in two hours.
The process isn't as much as brute forcing, as.. (whisper whisper) things to do with downloading packets (whisper whisper)
Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines and Privacy Policy.