The Everlasting Bonfire

Guy breaks into your house with a gun and you don't have one. What do you do? You die. If you had a gun, he'd more likely be dead. The problem actually is not guns.

 

Of course it is about guns. You yourself just said that it was the gun that was the problem, because you would get killed by it if you, yourself, do not own one.

 

Now imagine the situation where neither has a gun..! Perish the thought, no one dies.

A well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state. To have a well regulated militia, citizens need guns.

No, you're not using the punctuation correctly. This is one thought, so therefore, a militia is not the point. The statement is more like "In order to maintain the security of a free state, the citizens must have the right to keep and bear arms."

 

Also, homicide rates drop dramatically if there is 0% limitation on guns. Look at any country where there's practically no gun freedom. Insane homicide rates. Then look at Texas. Pretty much no gun limits. Very low homicide rates.

Hey guys Vatican City has some of the lowest homicide rates in the world! That country must be doing something right. -.-

 

Also, saying that guns don't kill people because people kill people is silly. I can have a gamecube but without any games, and it'd be worthless. And I can have a gamecube game without a gamecube, and it'd be worthless. I need both the gamecube and Super Monkey Ball 2 to properly play some shizzle. Likewise, a person (usually) doesn't kill people without a gun, and a gun (more usually) doesn't kill people without a person. Thus, guns don't kill people, and people don't kill people; people with guns kill peoplezzz.

 

I wasn't really paying attention so I don't know who I'm supporting, but that makes this post all the more objective -.-.

Hey guys Vatican City has some of the lowest homicide rates in the world! That country must be doing something right. -.-

 

Also, saying that guns don't kill people because people kill people is silly. I can have a gamecube but without any games, and it'd be worthless. And I can have a gamecube game without a gamecube, and it'd be worthless. I need both the gamecube and Super Monkey Ball 2 to properly play some shizzle. Likewise, a person (usually) doesn't kill people without a gun, and a gun (more usually) doesn't kill people without a person. Thus, guns don't kill people, and people don't kill people; people with guns kill peoplezzz.

 

I wasn't really paying attention so I don't know who I'm supporting, but that makes this post all the more objective -.-.

Go support lilshu, I don't want to be involved with bronies.

I'm glad everyone loves bronies so much <3

I'm glad everyone loves bronies so much <3

I love you Guitarguy, no matter what you choose to enjoy

 

EDIT: so long as its not horribly illegal

No no no no

Hey, someone has to take them. Everyone knows I'd shoot them if I HAD THE GUNS TO BE ABLE TO.

 

Also:

http://gunowners.org/sk0703.htm

I think this is a prime example why the second amendment should be kept.

 

Bronies: Bringing liberals and conservatives together since 2010

Yes, but you're still pretty contradictory there, but I'll forgive you for long enough to annihilate all bronies.

There's more important work at hand than a political debate!

Yes. Let us all just take Washington's advice and get rid of the political parties, and form one big organization called the "Union of Sane People Against Bronies"

BUT VERMIN SUPREME LIKES BRONIES

 

!

 

Guitarguy, on , said:

 

I'm glad everyone loves bronies so much <3

I love you Guitarguy, no matter what you choose to enjoy

 

EDIT: so long as its not horribly illegal

 

He got you there, Guitar.

Bronies are horribly illegal.

I was really thinking about kiddy fiddling and human trafficking, ponies are fine by me

Guys I'm sorry this happened

Admiral, on , said:

 

I'm oppressive lol

Yeah Amber this is a strict no fun zone didn't you read the blog rules you should go on the blog block list

sry for defending others

 

will try not to next time k

sry for defending others

 

will try not to next time k

Defend anyone except those persons.

 

Taker. Thanks.

What happen here?

To Second Amendment or not to Second Amendment, that is the question.

I'm in favour of the second amendment being advanced to alllow US citizens to carry personal nuclear weapons within their national borders (ONLY).

May not be very safe there but a great relief for the rest of the world in the near future.

amber you will never be correct

all your facts come from the internet

remember what you said

the internet is a lie

I actually grew sad reading this.

amber you will never be correct

all your facts come from the internet

remember what you said

the internet is a lie

Actually, my facts come from the Constitution and this magical thing called "common sense."

 

I'm gonna get negrep for that, but I don't give a fudge.

Lonely, on , said:

 

amber you will never be correct

all your facts come from the internet

remember what you said

the internet is a lie

Actually, my facts come from the Constitution and this magical thing called "common sense."

 

I'm gonna get negrep for that, but I don't give a fudge.

 

internet

lilshu 4 president of universe

I think we're all missing the point here. If we don't have guns, what will we do when the nuclear apocalypse occurs and the government turns on it's own citizens? We'll need guns to fight the government and the mutants!

fallout will happen i guarantee