Jethraw
-
Posts
5650 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Posts posted by Jethraw
-
-
What an awful excuse.
"You'll pick apart my argument so I won't make one."
10/10.
-
Cute name, rich in historical reasoning. Doubt the Duchess had much say in naming her child though.
-
Well, since the activity is off to a flying start
Vote: Gary Oak
Right out of the gate, huh? No surprise. You claim nonsense and then vote. Similar to how you started off on lilshu day-2.
Except my early vote in Day -2 was on Fake. Forgotten to tell the truth again?
And sue me, the game slowed down very quickly, not surprised that was the only part you responded to.
-
Well, since the activity is off to a flying start
Vote: Gary Oak
-
Just seen them bring the baby out of the hospital for the first time and begin their journey to Kensington Palace on TV.
It's been another couple of brilliant days to be British on the back of a series of British triumphs that show why we're the best in the world at pageantry. Whether you like it or not, it's been a hell of a spectacle, as per
My money's on James, it's been a while since we had a King James!
-
So again with the nonsense accusations. That's your claim to every single person you find suspicious.
No, just the ones that talk nonsense, (hey there!) But since you're going to prove me wrong and prove you aren't talking utter nonsense:
The reason I'm trying to explain myself is to clarify things for Adam?, not you.Right , that's logical
I also find it funny how you think my "argument" is poor for switching suspicions and that you call your counter-vote a bold movwas. It was a counter-vote whether or not you like it.I didn't say my so-called counter-vote was a bold move, I was saying players such as yourself refrain from making any bold moves, preferring to hide behind others and generally not making any waves to avoid suspicion, the raging inactivity being a prime example of that. As such, since there was nothing else to go off, I voted for Lilshu.
Instead of admitting it, you keep saying it wasn't, it was a bold move due to inactivity. I want to remind you that I also reminded everyone being biased on inactivity is the wrong direction to take. I think anyone who had a bias towards inactivity was scum.
I like how Jethraw is completely going after people who find him suspiciousSuch as Fake, who I'm criticising for not voting for a feasible candidate on Day -2?
it should be your berating of other's arguments, your constant defense to Gonzzy. I am just curious as to why we shouldn't be suspicious of him.I'm sorry, can you not read or are you just refusing to read? I was pointing out Gonzyy was stating that people who didn't vote for me (Fake, Gonzyy, Goggie) are the ones we should be especially wary of. I'm confused as to how reiterating it'd be worth looking at Gonzyy is defending him.
What I'd be especially keen to hear is Kamil. There were a lot of questions raised in regards to Amber in previous days, and Kamil has a lot of posting to do to make up for her inactivity, whatever the reason for it was.
I'm going to reiterate what Fake said here - what are Kamil's opinions on people who are left? Who would you lobby for?
-------------------
To summarise here: Gary Oak (for a series of posts that don't really make sense with arguments full of holes and falsehoods) and Fake (for refusing to vote for a viable candidate - justifying it by saying there are none) are the two that I'm most wary of at the opening of Day -3.
I'd like to hear more from Goggie and hear openings from Kamil.
And more from Entrility if he's remaining in the game, I'd practically forgotten you were here.
EBOWOP: There's a random chunk of Gary Oak's post below my third quote I forgot to remove.
-
Sorry that I thought Day was going to end (with or without my vote) and wasn't convinced that you were a viable option.
I was the closest to being lynched and you decided that doing nothing was the only solution? I don't buy it.
-
Right before deadline Fake went, "oh dear, no lynch here", didn't change his vote to a viable option and didn't post again for the rest of the day.
Goggie I'm not too sure about his whereabouts.
-
I'm not gone
Fake, Gonzyy and Goggie were three actives who could've yet didn't hammer me, unless I'm wrong Lonely.
-
My suspicions move towards Jethraw a bit as he counter-voted.
I still find this to be a poor argument, given that it wasn’t a counter-vote, the sheer lack of inactivity and unwillingness to actually make a bold move from players such as yourself meant that there was literally nothing else to go on and the vote was cast after a series of posts and asking questions. Especially given that you said to me
I only consider a counter-vote scum-like in the sense that the next post you make is a vote towards the person who voted for youWhich it wasn’t. To me it looks like another case of you glossing over posts and ignoring them to strengthen your points which you’ve been called out on before.
For the record, I did not want to bandwagon, but due to the fact we were on the verge of a no-lynch, I voted Jethraw.Which would be fine if it weren’t the latest in a series of 3 votes justified by questionable wording at best.
At least I admitted to being a part of the bandwagonAnd this makes it less suspicious because?
Another thing, Gonzzy, why should we look at those who stayed away from the fiasco? Saying we should look at the people who voted Jethraw means that we should not be suspicious of you. Why's that? Such a bold claim coming from someone who thought lilshu was scum. Saying you were convinced she was scum doesn't help you at all. Its as if you're trying to convince us that you, Goggie, and Jethraw are town.Didn’t he also state that the latter (those who didn’t vote for me) were more important to look into? This paragraph makes no sense.
Your final post on Day -2 is also what is ringing alarm bells for me. First of all failing to provide a truthful justification for voting me (tearing down Adam? On Day -1 and not on Day -2) which is downright incorrect. Second of all blaming me for ‘throwing you off the track and quite possibly onto this bandwagon’ – you’re going to great lengths to state that the bandwagon is necessary (albeit it was at the end of the day) and that its not your fault you’ve had to do it and repeating this multiple times. Screaming “Hey I bandwagoned but that’s okay because I’m admitting it!” repeatedly is just downright suspicious.
Fake also has a lot to answer for, his last post of Day -2 was that it was unlikely we’d get a lynch, and as such didn’t cast his vote anywhere useful, when if he had done so there’d have been a lynch.
That being said, Gary Oak’s posting has been all over the place since your voting started on Day -2 and is really making little sense in my mind as of right now. He is my #1 suspicion starting out Day -3 for this. Poor, cherry-picked justification and nonsensical posting.
-
I'm gonna opt in so hard
-
Doing my second year of English Literature and History :)
-
By proving that Mastersaske owns the account rather than the hacker and consequently recovering it, it proves to Jagex that the actions which resulted in his permanent ban were not executed by the account's owner. Therefore, upon restoring property of the account to Mastersaske, it should become unbanned. That's almost precisely what happened in my fairly recent experience, at least; a hacker had me permanently muted for spamming the forums, and after going through the process of proving ownership of my account everything was fixed.
It's worth a shot (albeit I don't think he's lost any part of the account, unless I'm misreading) it's just that Jagex tend to take a much harder line when it comes to botting, especially since the loss of the account was essentially the owner's own fault, and that led to the offence by the hacker.
-
The account's permanently banned Guitar, I'm not sure that proving ownership is the issue here.
-
The email was a phishing / scam website, so clicking the link in the email was the cause of those problems, which more than likely gave them access to your accounts personal information, and ultimately your account itself.
That being said, all you can really do is state what you've just told us in your final appeal for the account to Jagex and hope for the best. That's your last hope for that account, and if the appeal is rejected all you can do is move on and make a new account.
Sorry to be blunt but that's about all anyone here can do for you / tell you to do.
Best of luck.
-
I've got a couple I'm getting when my student loan comes in late September.
Both are pretty meaningful to me and have only been decided upon after years of consideration and I've had them drawn up and stuck on my wall for the past few months now.
Hoping to slim down a little around the waist before I get them though, so it's kind of a motivator.
-
Would anyone care to explain why these arguments are flimsy, rather than just constantly stating so?
Because although I 'undermined' everything you were trying to do (by responding, something that seems lost in almost every other aspect of this game) I also provided my own opinions in a similar vein which went completely ignored.
This will be my last post of the day now, as I'm leaving for the airport in the small hours and its about 17 hours travelling tomorrow.
-
At the minute I'm entertaining one of two things:
1 - Lilshu needs to pull his head out of his ass and realise its only a game, quit with the petty name calling and chucking his toys out of the pram at the word boo.
2 - Lilshu's playing crybaby tactics to try and get people to not vote for him, martyring himself by continuing playing, employed as soon as more than one person voted for him.
Both of these seem equally desperate to me and don't exactly scream town. Moreover now that the days been ground to a halt, is more than likely a no lynch and a free day for the mafia to sit back and laugh at us. That being said there's a multitude of reasons for the possible no lynch, I'll be home in about 48 hours time and able to post much more freely.
Needless to say my vote stands. Apparently I've 'distracted away from conversation with nearly every single one of my posts'. Which posts were these - the ones where I responded to the questions of others, or asked people for their opinions on a number of players and issues? Is that what we call analysis now?
As for Lilshu's defence, it's just mirroring the words of others as a 'careless' vote and piling blame elsewhere - on all but one of the people who've voted for him, it may be worth mentioning.
-
The one thing I would point out to Gary Oak is this: I've been calling lilshu's posts out since the word go because I found them odd, and the sheer arrogance I got in response told me all I needed to know.
Ironic that you called me out on that, considering your dickishness made me want to quit the game.
And if you can't detach yourself enough to not take playstyles personally, you probably shouldn't be playing.
-
Yeah I'm here. Figured I'd take a quick look in before deadline.
Sticking with my vote, because telling me that voting for him is silly/reckless doesn't mean much, since we're past explaining things.
Ill try and look again tomorrow before the deadline, but there's been very little in the way of discussion. Mafia have been given a free day and we're running dangerously close to a no lynch.
The one thing I would point out to Gary Oak is this: I've been calling lilshu's posts out since the word go because I found them odd, and the sheer arrogance I got in response told me all I needed to know. Call it a counter-vote if you like, I just find that a weak claim given that there was nothing else to stimulate discussion and at least I attempted to justify my arguments, something that's been sorely lacking.
-
Came to take a look again and see if anyone had responded to the questions I'd asked.
Ill probably come back just before deadline, because I don't see any point in trying to get online halfway across the world to check on a dead game.
-
Based on what? Huffing, not contributing, avoiding questions, making silly asides and downright ridiculous responses?
Seems about on par with Amber's lurking equalling pro-town.
-
Anyway, I've paid $USD10 for an hour online, and since rather than having my question answered - instead being returned with a ridiculous comment on my 3G allowances (which, as a 19 year old student, having international 3G on my monthly plan doesn't rank high in my priorities) ill leave you with some of my thoughts until I can get back on again.
-I don't see how inactivity can be excused and used as a pro-town tell.
-Lilshu appears to be doing a very good job of detracting from the actual game (I've asked you half a dozen direct questions since the day opened, not one has yet to be answered)
There's been very little in the way of opinions offered this day. We were asked for our top 3 candidates, very few answered, less still actually gave a reason (though I recall Lilshu promising then failing to deliver explanation for his.)
We were also asked opinions on amber/jordo I think - and I haven't seen anyone offer that.
It's all well and good picking at arguments that have been provided, but unless everyone starts pitching their own weight we're literally giving the mafia the easiest kind of day they could hope for, because more or less everyone is coasting at this point and its inevitably going to end with another random, baseless and useless lynch.
So I'll reiterate what we've been asked already and maybe someone might weigh in by the time I next get online.
Top 3? Reasons?
Amber? Town or scum? Why?
Any other opinions? I've seen a handful with no explanations - how is anyone going to get behind them if you don't give us a reason?
EBWOP: Just seen Lilshu's absolutely ridiculous response. Wow.
vote: Lilshu
While we're on the matter - Goggie. You just went abroad the other week and had lessened activity as a result. Am I the only one that pays something ridiculous for even turning my mobile data on abroad?
I'd also like opinions on Lilshu, he's literally detracted from the game at every possible point so far today, whilst providing nothing but ludicrous posts and minimal analysis, whilst berating others for the same thing.
-
Not when you're using 3G in Mexico and from the UK, Id prefer not to have a sky high phone bill, thanks.
My Little Mafia
in The 'Scape Lounge
Posted
Hi and Hi!
Who let the parrot in? If you're going to reiterate everything I've said against you, at least change the wording.
I've told you twice, I'm not defending Gonzyy, I've stated it's suspicious that he didn't hammer me and that he (and every one else who had the option to provide a lynch on Day -2) are definitely worth looking at. Constantly repeating things that are directly contrary to what I'm saying won't help you.
Admitting your own mess-ups in an attempt to cover your back is meaningless when everything else you say is shouting scum.