Jump to content
Sal's RuneScape Forum

Jethraw

Forum Member
  • Posts

    5650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Posts posted by Jethraw

  1. Just to let you know I'm leaving for my camping trip. I don't really think ill be able to make (m)any posts but I promise on Thursday I'm going to make a detailed post with opinions on every single player. Sorry about the timing.

  2. Just a forewarning - I'm going camping early tomorrow morning. I don't really know where or how good my 3G on my phone will be. Ill be trying to post as often as I can but no guarantees. Ill be back Thursday.

  3. I've always found the 'you're defending yourself and you wouldn't unless you had something to hide' argument weak. Look at Eg the last game to see why, especially when he only confirmed what I was saying.

     

    I find it more suspicious that you find a way to manipulate most posts into a cause for suspicion.

    Just trying to elicit some responses to whittle down my list. It's what all the active players are doing, including you.

    Or deflecting the possibility of raising any eyebrows by having an over-active pointing finger.

  4. I've always found the 'you're defending yourself and you wouldn't unless you had something to hide' argument weak. Look at Eg the last game to see why, especially when he only confirmed what I was saying.

     

    I find it more suspicious that you find a way to manipulate most posts into a cause for suspicion.

  5. @Sk8 - the thing is you can't take people's general personalities to mean anything about their role, otherwise you'd have the same scum/town combos every game. You can evaluate playstyles and how they match up to previous games. Goggie understood your post and is perfectly right in saying just because he's nice doesn't tell us a thing about what role he has been assigned.

     

    I mean, taking Tabt as an example of someone who isn't playing, last two games she's been the mother of all evil but other times has been pro town. Most people have played before and you can't base assumptions on their role based off what they've been before; each game and each moderator are different.

     

    As for double posting as far as I know it's perfectly acceptable.

  6. vote Fabio

    I don't know if I agree with you Kamil, Ent's posting style seems pretty consistent with what I'd expect from him.

     

    Except for the rhyme, if he says that's nothing to do with his role. I really don't get what that was all about.

  7. I agree and please don't prod me again!! I think Goggie has been very susipicous so far and my vote stays with him!

    Why has he been suspicious? What makes you believe that voting him early in Day 1 would provide us with a mafia lynch?

     

    Personally, I agree in that he was suspicious in the way he was responding to people and the texture of the posts were inconsistent. But I tend not to vote until later on in Day 1 because the majority of what's said in the opening week of Day 1 is useless crap that's potentially worth looking into later on in the game.

  8. You guys should probably try and take it a little more serious, RVS stage it may be but people's patience might wear thin if you just talk about non-game related things.

    Ent wanted to know who actually watches the show so I answered!!!

    If we could cut the crap and actually play with a degree of seriousness though, that'd be neat.

     

    Trying to actually keep to the game though:

     

    Like I've said previously, Goggie's posting style was the one that's struck me as oddest so far. Still too early to make any form of snap judgement on Day -1, which I think it would be safe to assume is Day 1 equivalent.

     

    Fabio's prod was utterly useless considering the subsequent post, so if he could be prodded again I'd appreciate that.

     

    Amber seems to be trying to remain utterly uncontrovercial, which may just be as a result of having been lynched on Day 1 last game, but your posts just always seem to have that edge to them that could makes you seem suspicious.

     

    The Goggie L-2 was more than likely accidental, but it'd be worth just bearing in mind those who voted, because it's not as if they won't have seen that Goggie had been voted for previously, random vote stage or no.

     

    That's all I've got from today so far, take it all with a grain of salt, given that it's still evidently random vote.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines and Privacy Policy.