Jump to content
Sal's RuneScape Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Gavin

Proof For Electromagnetism

Recommended Posts

I dunno but there doesn't seem to be any real evidence cos it's all just a theory. Like.. can we see it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take two magnets. They come together.

 

 

 

 

Is this thread serious? My sarcasm detector has gone off the charts.

Edited by Micronblast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take two magnets. They come together.

 

 

 

 

Is this thread serious? My sarcasm detector has gone off the charts.

 

That's not electromagnetism. Electromagnetism is a magnetic material that is not a magnet (such as iron) and passing an electric current through or around it to make it magnetically charged.

 

Anyway, the proof you have is we have those magnets at scrapyards. Like these.

2uetlpe.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its possible to see electricity, but magnetism is a invisible and abstract force.

And did you know the color of electricity varies from what charge it is on?

3 1,5v batteries makes a purple line and stronger is blue.

But its not red electricity, only purple at lowest power.

 

No, magnetism is abstarct and just a invisible force from either electricity or a magnet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know but you might have heard of a little thing called "MRI".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take two magnets. They come together.

 

 

 

 

Is this thread serious? My sarcasm detector has gone off the charts.

 

That's not electromagnetism. Electromagnetism is a magnetic material that is not a magnet (such as iron) and passing an electric current through or around it to make it magnetically charged.

 

Anyway, the proof you have is we have those magnets at scrapyards. Like these.

2uetlpe.jpg

 

Isn't normal magnetism induced by the orientation of domains (electron direction) in a metal? Or is that ye-olde school simplification?

 

 

But I admit, I misread epically :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right -- we can't see it so it probably doesn't exist.

 

Goodbye, gravity :wub:

 

*Wiltingplant floats into the stratosphere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know but you might have heard of a little thing called "MRI".

Stop disrespecting his beliefs! :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the phenomena when an electric current is run through a metal, creating a magnetic force, nothing theoretic about that. :wub: The theory is the part that explains the phenomena, the commonly accepted one having something to do with orientation of the electrons in the atoms.. or something. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism

 

I think the OP meant whether or not that theory has been proved, or if it is simply a generally accepted theory. Owing to its nature as a scientific theory, it is based on the results of various tests and is considered highly likely to be true, but has not been proved true by actual observation of the electrons switching directions. This of course because electrons are way, way, WAY too small to be observed visually, being only a tiny fraction the size of an atom. We can't even visualize atoms properly, so the only real way to form theories on these small particle scales is by doing experiments and looking for logical conclusions, like the theory behind electromagnetism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not electromagnetism! That's just magnetism! What about electromagnetism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's obvious that electromagnetism exists. It says so in my Physics textbook.

Edited by Gillis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've realised that a lot of people actually don't know what they're talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've realised that a lot of people actually don't know what they're talking about.

That doesn't allow you to contradict them without proof! :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've realised that a lot of people actually don't know what they're talking about.

That doesn't allow you to contradict them without proof! :wub:

We don't need proof. Only they need proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dunno but there doesn't seem to be any real evidence cos it's all just a theory. Like.. can we see it?

Can we see oxygen, or gravity, or heat?

Yes. Yes we can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know but you might have heard of a little thing called "MRI".

Its impossible to see by the human eye, but of course a machine can see it if it uses the right frequence of detection,

but its not possible to see by your own eye.

Its actually very strange, that an object can pull specific metals to it.

Ever tried to dig down a magnet and dig it up again?

You will get small metal-particles on it and some bigger.

Metals are everywhere.. :ice:

And same with cells :wub:

You can only see them clear through a electron-microscope. (then its about the smallest ones.. )

But oxygen is difficult to keep still, it would need a tiny, tiny, tiny box filled with just oxygen.. :wub:

Edited by King Aragorn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i think you can recognize heat but you can't actuallty see it ????

and isn't electromagnetism electric? because electricity can only be seen at this point in time in models and such the best microscrope is one that uses Electron

i seriously dont know what am talking about here so dont spam or flame me do that to the kittens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Electromagnetism isn't just magnetism. It's the interaction between charged particles in an electromagnetic field. Electric fields and magnetic fields are interlinked, hence electromagnetic field. These interactions are governed by electromagnetic radiation. Light is a form of electromagnetic radiation. Hence, we can see electromagnetism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So its about that a group of cells that has more protons then neutrons?

Which would make it +1 or more?

or is that a isotope?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So its about that a group of cells that has more protons then neutrons?

Which would make it +1 or more?

or is that a isotope?

>So its about that a group of cells that has more protons then neutrons?

>So its about that a group of cells

>group of cells

>cells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people have absolutely no idea what they are on about :wub:

Edited by Doddsy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard electromagnetism before.

 

Therefore I see no reason not to believe it.

 

wen i walkd neer da powr lins i herd a buz

wen da powr wuz off i didnt heer da buz

this not coinsedenz

 

EDIT: Oops, forgot this.

 

In dee interwebz we call dis anti-lulz

Edited by Indigo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines and Privacy Policy.