Atheros Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 (edited) Is it more effective to attack with range or melee in f2p? I've had some success, but always seem to break even on death/kill ratio. Which one would be better to pk with? Stats/Goals: Attack: 40/40 Strength: 64/70 Defence: 40/40 or 45 Range: 65/70-75 Mage: 56/59 Prayer: 31 My equipment would be: Melee: Rune full helm, monk robe top, rune legs, rune kite, rune scimmy, cape, and str ammy. (r2h in inv with str pot and food) Range: Rune Full, green d'hide top, rune legs, maple shortbow, cape, and power ammy. (r2h in inv with food) Which would be more effective to kill with? Edited October 19, 2009 by Atheros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curry Leafs Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 I would say don't get defense and stay 1 defense, but the 2nd option would be more efficient in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry slater Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Also if you do range, wear a rune med. Rune fulls actually have negative range bonuses, while rune meds do not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajax Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Also if you do range, wear a rune med. Rune fulls actually have negative range bonuses, while rune meds do not. methinks they have -1 ranged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.