The Sals Wildy Poll

[The Darkest]

Wilderness and Free Trade: Yes or No?

[Pureosaur]

Make separate ones for wildy and for free trade?

[Trey]

I didn't vote, so I don't agree with it. I think that the trade limit is fine as it is. There should be no need to trade over the limit. I think that the wild is fine too.

 

Jagex needs to make users login to vote instead of just entering their username. I heard that people are just entering their friends names into the form to get extra votes. It wasn't really smart of Jagex to do that. They should have put a no option too.

Edited December 21, 2010 by Trey

[Ethereal Den]

I think the wilderness would be very inconvenient for a lot of players considering many people don't really like pking and running into pkers while trying to runecraft, mine, make money, get to clan wars, get to corp beast, or complete a clue scroll doesn't sound like fun... IT SOUNDS LIKE IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY ANNOYING!

 

As far as free trade goes, I don't think the average runescape player is responsible enough to handle it.... scammers will be back and the gold farmers will be back in full force. The economy will have gone down the crapper, and trying to buy simple supplies will eventually become difficult because of the very annoying average player. I swear sometimes the worst thing possible is for these people to try and think.

 

If things go as I expect them to, I imagine that I'll be quitting runescape permanently, or perhaps reserve myself to a lonely dungeoneer.

 

Also the fact that you don't even have to prove you are who you say you are to vote on this matter leads me to believe that this poll is pure BS. This is an extremely important issue, it pretty much decides the fate of the game in the eyes of a lot of players, and I can't seem to believe its serious. Secretly I'm hoping that its just some sort of bad dream, bracing for suckatude.

[Sax]

Both, just so long as there are some rev/no pking in the wildy worlds so we can quest/do clues/corp/kbd/other.

[Shadowkid]

Both, just so long as there are some rev/no pking in the wildy worlds so we can quest/do clues/corp/kbd/other.

 

Where's the excitement in that? :D

Abyss pking? funfun.

[Sax]

Both, just so long as there are some rev/no pking in the wildy worlds so we can quest/do clues/corp/kbd/other.

 

Where's the excitement in that? :D

Abyss pking? funfun.

I don't want excitement, I want to be able to get my mediocre clue rewards without having my eyes glued to a mini-map so that I don't get claw rushed...

[Kemosabe]

Don't even know why you'd bother, they're not going to change anything. It's a stunt to set a world record.

[Shadowkid]

Both, just so long as there are some rev/no pking in the wildy worlds so we can quest/do clues/corp/kbd/other.

 

Where's the excitement in that? :(

Abyss pking? funfun.

I don't want excitement, I want to be able to get my mediocre clue rewards without having my eyes glued to a mini-map so that I don't get claw rushed...

 

That's no fun. :D

[firebomb148]

I voted yes because thats the runescape I liked

[Lonelywolf]

Trade limit is handy, if you don't know the prices of things.

I don't want the wildy back.

But I do want trade limit, coz I have friends with 500mil+ and they said if there were no trade limit they would give me some money. :D

[Ak-47]

I voted yes because thats the runescape I liked

This.

 

Greatest time to play RuneScape, when you had to work.

[Redi]

Don't even know why you'd bother, they're not going to change anything. It's a stunt to set a world record.

 

But what record would that be? I can't think of any meaningful record they could achieve by doing this...

[Uther]

A year ago, I would have said no

Now I just don't care anymore, RuneScape is already getting bad with a lot of stupid updates, so who cares? Do whatever you want Jagex

[Herty]

Don't even know why you'd bother, they're not going to change anything. It's a stunt to set a world record.

 

But what record would that be? I can't think of any meaningful record they could achieve by doing this...

Most raging teen posts on an internet forum, as a guess.

 

I voted yes on this poll and obviously the runescape poll. Was number 8000 and something :D

[Lonelywolf]

Don't even know why you'd bother, they're not going to change anything. It's a stunt to set a world record.

 

But what record would that be? I can't think of any meaningful record they could achieve by doing this...

Probably be something really obvious like most people to vote on getting the old wildy and free trade back in however amount of days.

[Herty]

http://www.webcitation.org/5v9QLK2vh

 

It was a "promotional thing"

[Lol]

Bring wild, don't bring free trade, 'cause free trade = no ge, and I quite like not camping fally sq w2 spamming "BUYING DDS 60K" for 3 hours.

Edited December 22, 2010 by Lol

[Veni vidi vici]

BIG YES: AS LONG AS THIS DOES NOT ALLOW BOTS, GOLD FARMERS, LURERS OR SCAMMERS TO COME BACK.

 

Fudge yes, just as long as gold farming and luring and other scams don't come back. Keep up the Wilderness Wall, and all the warnings. Maybe don't allow combat until something like level 3-4 wilderness for noobs too?

The current system is much better than Bounty Hunter was (Let's admit it, Bounty Hunter sucked), but isn't the same as the old Wildy. I'd say keep PvP worlds though, they're sick.

~Vincent

[Ming Der]

Brrr, went on sals used 40 accounts to vote, got a voting auto macro proxy voting for it now once per 30 seconds using random names fromt he highscores.

 

-Ming :D

[Lunar]

They've said the Ge would be staying, gravestones would stay (but not in the wilderness), staking also is back, and the wilderness ditch would stay, to prevent luring.

 

Alot of people don't know this, but there was RWT going on this whole time, just bots doing various methods hours upon hours.

 

Everyone has been scammed in the last year or two with merchant clans, making prices fluctuate wildly. This should decrease scamming if anything. Anyone that falls for "trimming rune armor" only falls for it once, but everyone is constantly being scammed by manipulators.