Jump to content
Sal's RuneScape Forum

Debates About Religion.


Moog

Recommended Posts

This is my opinion, just making sure everyone understands that <3

 

 

When I go look at a debate topic about religion, I see a lot of people jumping down each others throats because they don't agree.

 

Someone believes in the Bible > Athiest tells him its fake > Bible-believing person gets hurt.

 

 

You could argue that they have to deal with it, but, you can't just go around ignoring everyone else and tell them they are wrong, it just won't work.

 

 

 

TL;DR:

 

Religion/political debates need to be banned/be heavily moderated, most of the forum is liberal and athiest, so people who aren't like that tend to get shot down.

 

 

 

Please don't just disregard this and call me names and tell me my opinion is invalid, because if that happens, that is just proof that I am right.

 

<3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of topics that go off rail into religious debates is stupid. Something needs to be done.

 

That is my point, a lot of religious debates that start never end well either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm neither atheist nor liberal and I don't see a problem.

 

I'm sorry you get offended that people think differently, but that doesn't give you special rights.

 

Wow.

 

I see a lot of people get offended just because they think different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm neither atheist nor liberal and I don't see a problem.

 

I'm sorry you get offended that people think differently, but that doesn't give you special rights.

 

Wow.

 

I see a lot of people get offended just because they think different.

And? So what if someone gets offended. That's the whole nature of a debate...

 

warning language, but relevant

 

EX5v4.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by redmonke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm neither atheist nor liberal and I don't see a problem.

 

I'm sorry you get offended that people think differently, but that doesn't give you special rights.

 

Wow.

 

I see a lot of people get offended just because they think different.

And? So what if someone gets offended. That's the whole nature of a debate...

 

warning language, but relevant

 

EX5v4.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

A debate is for people to compare opinions until a compromise is met. Not for people to offend one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm neither atheist nor liberal and I don't see a problem.

 

I'm sorry you get offended that people think differently, but that doesn't give you special rights.

 

Wow.

 

I see a lot of people get offended just because they think different.

And? So what if someone gets offended. That's the whole nature of a debate...

 

warning language, but relevant

 

EX5v4.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

A debate is for people to compare opinions until a compromise is met. Not for people to offend one another.

Some people get offended when they're told their man in the sky isn't real and their lack of logic or reasoning isn't helping them. I personally get offended when I'm told they don't sell toilets made of solid gold despite all of the logical reasons behind needing one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My English teacher once said that everything boils down to sex and religion. The reason so many debates turn into religious debates is that many religious people (including me) base many of their opinions on the religion.

Anyway, if you get hurt when somebody disagrees with you, you shouldn't be debating in the first place. Your opinion is perfectly valid, but I think you're too worried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20110223.gif

 

 

 

 

I'm neither atheist nor liberal and I don't see a problem.

 

I'm sorry you get offended that people think differently, but that doesn't give you special rights.

this, only difference is that I'm not sorry, I find it rather sad really

Edited by Egghebrecht
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of topics that go off rail into religious debates is stupid. Something needs to be done.

That is my point, a lot of religious debates that start never end well either.

 

Most 'debates' in fact don't end at all. It's rarely the case that everyone will unanimously agree to a compromise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, Zar0s, you can leave those threads. Some of us [myself included!] enjoy reading them, or idly participating in them because some of us [myself included!] are not offended by other peoples' viewpoints.

 

It would be a sad, sad day that we got rid of Debates about Religion. A quiet, sad, sad day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we don't have rules against controversial topics and opinions in the debate room, there are rules that prevent topics from drifting off on tangents or descending into flaming.

 

Many on the staff feel that, because conversation flows naturally, topics should be allowed a certain amount of breathing room when they drift, because this is inevitable and not necessarily a bad thing (we don't want to be stomping out too many discussions, after all). However, this is an interpretation of the rules, so if you think they should be interpreted differently, there's nothing wrong with voicing it.

 

Zaros, would you mind elaborating a bit on what you think would be a solution? That is, how strictly should we enforce off-topic rules in the debate room/breaking news specifically?

 

Also, if anyone is flaming in a topic, it certainly shouldn't be allowed to slip by. However, insulting/criticizing ideas (e.g. religion, politics, economics) is generally something we allow. We generally make a distinction between toward whom/what the insults are directed. If it's a user, it's out of bounds. If it's an idea, it's in bounds, unless it's so acrimonious or personal that it actually insults holders of that belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we don't have rules against controversial topics and opinions in the debate room, there are rules that prevent topics from drifting off on tangents or descending into flaming.

 

Many on the staff feel that, because conversation flows naturally, topics should be allowed a certain amount of breathing room when they drift, because this is inevitable and not necessarily a bad thing (we don't want to be stomping out too many discussions, after all). However, this is an interpretation of the rules, so if you think they should be interpreted differently, there's nothing wrong with voicing it.

 

Zaros, would you mind elaborating a bit on what you think would be a solution? That is, how strictly should we enforce off-topic rules in the debate room/breaking news specifically?

 

Also, if anyone is flaming in a topic, it certainly shouldn't be allowed to slip by. However, insulting/criticizing ideas (e.g. religion, politics, economics) is generally something we allow. We generally make a distinction between toward whom/what the insults are directed. If it's a user, it's out of bounds. If it's an idea, it's in bounds, unless it's so acrimonious or personal that it actually insults holders of that belief.

 

I think the debate room and breaking news should have a lot tighter rules then the other forums because a lot times someone will post a thread in the news forum bout some scientific thing and before you know it a religious debate starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we don't have rules against controversial topics and opinions in the debate room, there are rules that prevent topics from drifting off on tangents or descending into flaming.

 

Many on the staff feel that, because conversation flows naturally, topics should be allowed a certain amount of breathing room when they drift, because this is inevitable and not necessarily a bad thing (we don't want to be stomping out too many discussions, after all). However, this is an interpretation of the rules, so if you think they should be interpreted differently, there's nothing wrong with voicing it.

 

Zaros, would you mind elaborating a bit on what you think would be a solution? That is, how strictly should we enforce off-topic rules in the debate room/breaking news specifically?

 

Also, if anyone is flaming in a topic, it certainly shouldn't be allowed to slip by. However, insulting/criticizing ideas (e.g. religion, politics, economics) is generally something we allow. We generally make a distinction between toward whom/what the insults are directed. If it's a user, it's out of bounds. If it's an idea, it's in bounds, unless it's so acrimonious or personal that it actually insults holders of that belief.

 

I think the debate room and breaking news should have a lot tighter rules then the other forums because a lot times someone will post a thread in the news forum bout some scientific thing and before you know it a religious debate starts.

Got any evidence of that happening? Or, you know, more than a couple times?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a solution here.

 

Don't go into the topics.

 

That's one of the main reasons I don't bother with religion debate topics. They're never ending, and you're arguing an idea that can't be proven or disproven. Debates aren't fun if there is no way to win them.

Edited by Emo Nemo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a solution here.

 

Don't go into the topics.

 

That's one of the main reasons I don't bother with religion debate topics. They're never ending, and you're arguing an idea that can't be proven or disproven. Debates aren't fun if there is no way to win them.

why don't we just not go on the forums anymore

 

because we might get offended

 

best not take that chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a solution here.

 

Don't go into the topics.

 

That's one of the main reasons I don't bother with religion debate topics. They're never ending, and you're arguing an idea that can't be proven or disproven. Debates aren't fun if there is no way to win them.

why don't we just not go on the forums anymore

 

because we might get offended

 

best not take that chance

wow dats whats killing sals ur offending me :(:mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a solution here.

 

Don't go into the topics.

 

That's one of the main reasons I don't bother with religion debate topics. They're never ending, and you're arguing an idea that can't be proven or disproven. Debates aren't fun if there is no way to win them.

why don't we just not go on the forums anymore

 

because we might get offended

 

best not take that chance

wow dats whats killing sals ur offending me :(:mad:

you just referenced killing some1

i kno somebody who was killed

 

offensive much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a solution here.

 

Don't go into the topics.

 

That's one of the main reasons I don't bother with religion debate topics. They're never ending, and you're arguing an idea that can't be proven or disproven. Debates aren't fun if there is no way to win them.

why don't we just not go on the forums anymore

 

because we might get offended

 

best not take that chance

wow dats whats killing sals ur offending me :(:mad:

you just referenced killing some1

i kno somebody who was killed

 

offensive much

wow ur disagreeing w/ me stop being so offensive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines and Privacy Policy.