Jump to content
Sal's RuneScape Forum

Messages Inbox limit... too low?


Melik

Recommended Posts

I don't know if this has been addressed previously or even recently, since I haven't exactly been very active as of late, but something that has always bugged me is Sal's Forums' message limits. I never understood why we were so limited in how many messages we could store in our inboxes. Sal's doesn't have millions of users, and the messages are just text anyways, how hard can it be to store?

 

So with the new forum update, I was alarmed to find that the message limit was still at the old level. This feels very antiquated and 1990s-ish to still have an inbox limit. Is there any way we can have this limit upped? I have many messages spanning almost 6 years on the forums and I cringe from nostalgia every time I have to delete a message from back in the day.

 

Comments? Criticisms? Rebukes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I addressed this at one point with Xaria, and she said (IIRC - the message has since been deleted) that they were considering the possibility of raising the limit.

 

I am in full support of this :( I ride 85% constantly, while deleting messages regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Donate to the site and you will receive 1000 inbox message limit + a shiny pip. :(

 

Anywho I agree with you. I'm pretty sure the average message takes around 50KB (just a random guess :D) so I don't see why we can't raise the limit, considering the small dwindling of activity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that a higher inbox space would be handy, but think of it this way.

 

If every single member currently filled up there inbox half way (or to 50).

 

That's 825,650 personal messages that would never be deleted.

 

Mods have a cap of 1000.

 

Retired mods also have that cap (i'm presuming, since yuan has been one before).

 

There are 44 retired mods as well as 5 mods. That's like 49,000.

 

Which is bringing our total quite a way up.

Edited by Fatalysm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you need to hold on to PMs? Can't you just put them in a text document if they're that important?

 

Or am I missing something because nobody loves me enough to send me meaningful PMs? cry.gif

 

That'd be all fine and dandy, but it's a lot more hassle to store them. It'd be a lot easier to leave stuff you need archived on Sal's (despite this, I do indeed put them in a text document if they're not immediately related to Sal's... but this is a relatively small portion of important messages).

 

I found Xaria's PM before I deleted everything tongue.png

 

...You could allocate individuals with extra PM space? I find the current limit very restrictive, especially if I need to save PM's (of which there are a rather lot of doing Blender work with WolfieMario).

 

Unfortunately there isn't a way to give an individual extra PM space. In order to give you more space, I'd need to edit the Forum Member group to give all members in that group more space.

You could try making a topic in Forum & Site Feedback to request PM space to be increased. If there are many people who find the limit too restrictive as well, then it may be increased.

 

So, you've essentially done that. We just need to get as much support as we can tongue.png

Edited by Hunter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what people actually need back is a method of archiving posts. For instance, you used to be able to archive your personal messages into html. That way you can store them on your computer rather than clogging a server.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what people actually need back is a method of archiving posts. For instance, you used to be able to archive your personal messages into html. That way you can store them on your computer rather than clogging a server.

 

This would be ideal. There must be a way of implementing this?

 

That still doesn't answer why you need to store PMs en-masse.

 

Not being narky, just genuinely confused as to why people need to store PMs, it's not something I've ever needed to do.

 

I understand your query; it's just a little difficult to explain :( I personally had (before I deleted almost everything) a bunch of PM's from Wolfie regarding 3D modelling. This had details about modelling, images already hosted and displayed, etc. Sure, I could copy everything into a document, but it's just that much more hassle.

 

Imo its never going to be ebough. if you let it get up to 1000 then that'll fill up and you wont want to delete anything. And then you'll complain and want more space.

 

While that could be true of some people, I don't tend to have said problem. When I don't need something anymore, I delete it. Otherwise my PM's are clogged up with masses of irrelevant stuff. But it is a point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm at like 95% right now and think a little bit more space would be nice.

 

Jethraw, I really don't want to save 50 PMs on my computer and then have to go through the folder and open it up and find the one I need.

Much easier to just go to the messages section on Sal's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I ever really found it a major problem handling PM's, but then that might be nostalgia/memory loss kicking in. I can see why it'd be nice to have more PM's, even 50 more would i'm sure be greatly appreciated. It'd be good to know what kind of effect 50 more spaces would have on hosting/memory clog if say, 50 or 100 was added to Forum Member.

 

Though, would it then make sense to create more space for DM's? I dunno, not sure that it'd be necessary but if Forum Members went up to 100 and DM was 250 it'd almost just be a token increase, rather than one made with anticipation of handling reports/problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm only at 81% and rarely do I receive messages (and to be honest I could probably delete quite a number, most of the PMs I have on the first page are from Gonzy about Mafia) but in the past I have deleted a lot of PMs that I would rather have kept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that a higher inbox space would be handy, but think of it this way.

 

If every single member currently filled up there inbox half way (or to 50).

 

That's 825,650 personal messages that would never be deleted.

 

Mods have a cap of 1000.

 

Retired mods also have that cap (i'm presuming, since yuan has been one before).

 

There are 44 retired mods as well as 5 mods. That's like 49,000.

 

Which is bringing our total quite a way up.

 

Assuming a 20kb per post. That wouldn't take up very much space at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that a higher inbox space would be handy, but think of it this way.

 

If every single member currently filled up there inbox half way (or to 50).

 

That's 825,650 personal messages that would never be deleted.

 

Mods have a cap of 1000.

 

Retired mods also have that cap (i'm presuming, since yuan has been one before).

 

There are 44 retired mods as well as 5 mods. That's like 49,000.

 

Which is bringing our total quite a way up.

 

Assuming a 20kb per post. That wouldn't take up very much space at all.

I implore you to read my next post after that, it breathes more sanity.

 

Also what other people have said. You get space, you fill it. You want more space, you get it and you fill it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That still doesn't answer why you need to store PMs en-masse.

 

Not being narky, just genuinely confused as to why people need to store PMs, it's not something I've ever needed to do.

I agree. I've gotten like 30 PMs in all my years being here :(

 

If you are filling it up constantly, why not add that person on IM or something!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I don't know if anyone has taken this into consideration. Also, whether or not this will help with storage or not.

 

However personal messages are now stored in a conversational way, so rather than sending someone 5 different messages with different subjects, you could save inbox space by using one conversation on one person. That effectively only limits you to 100 people and out of that 100 people how many are going to be important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines and Privacy Policy.